An illustrative story
Grace’s story
An HR director bringing a key employee from her company’s office abroad.
- 41
- HR and operations director
- Toronto
- Intra-company transfer
The challenge
Bring a specialist from the company’s London office
Grace’s team needed an experienced specialist from the London office, fast. She wasn’t sure whether the move needed a labour market assessment, or what the company had to prove.
The story
Grace’s journey with Global Compass
Moment 1 of 8:
Meet Grace
“I lead HR at a Toronto company with offices around the world.”
Read the whole story
- Meet Grace. “I lead HR at a Toronto company with offices around the world.”
- The challenge. “We need a specialist from our London office. Where do I even begin?”
- Finding Global Compass. “Global Compass Corporate walked me through our options as an employer.”
- Telling the story. “I described the role, the employee and how our companies are related.”
- Lawyer-backed answers. “A lawyer reviewed our intra-company transfer options and what we need to show.”
- Help that keeps going. “Now we track every work permit date and condition in one place.”
- The way forward. “Our specialist’s work permit application is ready to go.”
- What comes next. “Our application is in, complete, and every date is in our tracker.”
What Global Compass checked
The rules behind Grace’s story
Real requirements, from official sources.
- The companies must be related: a parent, subsidiary, branch or affiliate.
Official source - Both must be actively doing business, not just holding an office.
Official source - The employee needs one year of continuous full-time work with the company abroad in the last three years.
Official source - Specialized knowledge transfers need advanced company knowledge and expertise, and at least the prevailing wage.
Official source
The way forward
A clear next step
With the requirements mapped out and every date in the compliance tracker, Grace’s team prepared a complete application and can see every permit date at a glance.
Start your employer assessmentGrace is an illustrative character, not a real client, and this outcome is an example, not a promise. Every case is different, and only the government decides.
